Freadom
Book Burning, Cuba & ALA
Book Burning Documentation:

A Chronology of Attempts to Bring the Burning of Books in Cuba
 to the Attention of the American Library Association

"There were many beautiful books, but as they contained nothing but superstitions and falsehoods of the Devil, we burnt them." -- Diego de LANDA, Bishop of Yucatan

Journalist:  “Comandante, are there books prohibited in Cuba?”
Castro: “There are no books prohibited in Cuba. There is just not enough money to buy them all.”
February 1998, at the International Book Fair held in Havana
 
1999-2002

Reports of book burning emerge from Cuba and are reported on the Friends of Cuban Libraries web site. See Friends of Cuban Libraries press release entitled "Library Books Burned, Buried, Dumped" (December 10, 1999) and "Library Books Burned, Buried, Dumped: A Mystery Solved?" (March 9, 2000), and the following post of September 21, 2002. (See full text at end of this report)

April 2003

Following the arrests of 75 dissidents in late March 2003, the trials excerpted below were held for defendants who had been involved in attempts to form independent libraries. The Cuban court records, later obtained and translated by the Florida State University Center for the Advancement of Human Rights and posted on the “Rule of Law in Cuba” web site at http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu/, document many of the titles taken from these residential libraries. The court records cited below also contain directions for the incineration of the books, or their destruction by other means, as follows.

(See many translations of Court Documents, with lists of the books that were burned, at the end of this report.)

September 2, 2003
 
Associated Press writer John Pain publishes the article, “Cuban documents show dissidents received no justice,” reporting on the launching of the web site containing orders for the incineration of books in the above sentencing documents excerpted above, at the Florida State University Center for the Advancement of Human Rights. 
 
December 9, 2003

John Berry sends e-mail to ALA Council list which mentions an "investigation" into the book burning documents. Freadom later learned (see below) that Amnesty International officials were turned down in their offer to help this process, and that the FSU center which Mr. Berry mentions here was never called to ask about the documents.

http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/ALACOUN/log0312/msg00105.html

Quoted in a fax From Walter Skold to Nat Hentoff  January, 7th 2004
·  To: ALA Council List <alacoun@ala1.ala.org>
·  Subject: [ALACOUN:10909] Message from John W. Berry re: Cuba
·  From: "Elizabeth Dreazen" <edreazen@ala.org>
·  Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:13:31 -0600
·  Cc: "John W. Berry" <jberry@nilrc.org>

Council Colleagues:  With the recent volume of messages regarding Cuba on the Council list, I want to provide a very brief update on the joint IFC/IRC Task Force looking at this issue.  IFC Chair, Nancy C. Kranich and I (as IRC chair) appointed a joint Task Force on Cuba this fall in response to last summer's Council referral of an IRC resolution on these issues back to the two committees.  Peg Ottinger, Martin Garnar and Candace Morgan are the IFC representatives while Al Kagan, Anne Lipow and I (as convener) represent the IRC.  This group has been reviewing and examining a wide range of documents and reports from ALA, IFLA, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, plus materials provided by members, and other sources (including transcript copies that are said to be from some of trials of Cuban dissidents http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu/index.cfm 

The International Relations Office is currently investigating the group hosting these documents and is examining the veracity of the documents themselves.  The Task Force will meet by conference call next week. We want to thank Councilors for your comments as the Task Force evaluates these complex and often intensely political issues. The Task Force will make a recommendation to the full IRC and IFC as we move toward the Midwinter Meeting next month.
John W. Berry Chair, International Relations Committee and Past President The American Library Association

“Information is the currency of democracy." -- Thomas Jefferson  "If information is the currency of democracy, then libraries are the banks." --Wendell Ford, former U.S. Senator 

Anne Grodzins Lipow (Term: 07/01/02 - 06/30/04)
Director Library Solutions Institute 2137 Oregon St. Berkeley, CA 94705
Tel: (510) 841-2636    Fax: (510) 841-2926
Al Kagan
IFC Chair  Nancy C. Kranich (2002–2004);
212-874-5860; nancy.kranich@nyu.edu
Candace D. Morgan (2001–2005), Fort Vancouver Regional Library, 707 SW Dolph Street, Portland, OR 97219; 360-699-8817; Fax: 360-693-2681
Margaret Anne Oettinger (2002–2004), 631-928-4387;
Martin Garnar (2003–2004), Regis University, Dayton Memorial Library, (303) 964-5459; Fax: (303) 964-5497

January 14, 2004
 
The ALA joint task force report by members of the Intellectual Freedom Committee and the International Relations Committee is accepted and approved by the ALA Council. The controversy at this time was whether to ask for release of those imprisoned for their involvement with independent libraries, rather than any concern over the burning of books.
 
Spring 2005
 
The scheduled appearance of author Ray Bradbury, author of Fahrenheit 451, the temperature at which paper spontaneously ignites, presents an opportunity to highlight the ignition and incineration of books ordered by the Cuban courts in April 2003.
 
Columnist Nat Hentoff, who has become involved in protesting the ALA failure to demand the release of persons imprisoned for exercising their freedom to read in Cuba, contacts Ray Bradbury and provides him with background on this issue.

June 25, 2005
 
Walter Skold writes first request to Don Wood to include Cuban examples of book burning to the ALA book buring page.
 
WSkold <libertas@dialmaine.com> 06/25/05 1:55 PM >
Hello Mr. Wood,
 
 The web page said to write you with comments/questions.
 
 I did not see anything about the book burning that has occured in Cuba  recently, so I wanted to bring that to your attention for placement with  the other examples.
 
 I have attached a file with the examples from the website which has documented this. These could just as well go on the destruction of libraries page too, as   collections were ordered destroyed as well in 2003.
 
 Let me know what you think, Sincerely,  Walter Skold
 
June 27-28, 2005
 
Bradbury, in his televideo linked address to ALA, did not mention Cuba’s burned books. Following his remarks to the ALA meeting, Bradbury sent to Nat Hentoff the statement following statement with his permission to publish and attribute his words:

“I stand against any library or any librarian anywhere in the world being imprisoned or punished in any way
for the books they circulate. I plead with Castro and his government to immediately take their hands off
the independent librarians and release all those librarians in prison and send them back into Cuban culture
to inform the people.” Ray Bradbury
                                    -- Telephone call of
4:30 p.m. EDT, 27 June 20, day of keynote speech to ALA

July 3, 2005
 
After not hearing back from Mr. Wood, Walter Skold posts an “Open Question for Don Wood” on the IFFORUM listserv, providing the web site URL for the sentencing documents and asking why ALA book burning web page fails to mention these documented book burnings.
http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFFORUM/log0507/msg00041.html

On this July 4^th  weekend, when the ALA is launching yet another
campaign vs. the abuse of liberties that might, or could take place
under the Patriot Act, the independent library movement in Cuba still
has members rotting in Castro’s jails. Secret police have infiltrated
their friends, patron records have been stolen, dissident-librarians
have been sentenced after Stalinist show trials, and to top it all off –
their book collections have been destroyed and actually BURNED!
 
See:   http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu/search.cfm?q=incineration&confirm=Search
<http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu/search.cfm?q=incineration&confirm=Search>
 
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45050
 
Since Mr. Wood has not answered several e-mails of mine, (and neither
could Judith Krug be found for 2 days to respond to media inquiries
about book burning) I am asking this open question on an open list in
hopes that I might get some statement for my next news article (It
doesn’t look to go to have to say in a story, that despite Ray Bradbury
speaking out about book burning in Cuba, the ALA did not respond with a
comment.)
 
So, Mr. Wood, if you have an answer to any of these questions, please
let them be made public.
 
1. Why does the ALA webpage on book burning which you oversee fail to
mention the documented book burnings in Cuba? ALA leaders have KNOWN for
over a year about these fanatical actions of Cuban judges, but have not
once made any statement vs. it? You have found time to post information
about the treatment of the Koran in Gitmo (which was NOT burned and
stolen from the inmates), but you still have not seen fit to educate
people about Cuban violations, where actual books were burned? Why is
this, sir?
 
Do you plan to add them to site anytime soon?
 
2. Why, when you posted to the IFACTION list the WND article that I
wrote, did you not mention anything about the fact that it dealt with
Ray Bradbury’s call for the release of the independent librarians, nor
about book burning? He had just been a keynote speaker in Chicago, was
this news unworthy? Instead, you posted a nice, positive quote from
Bradbury that appeared in the Sun-Times. Are you trying to cast doubt on
his quote, or hide it? I don’t want to assume, but since you will not
answer my emails, and the Press Office can’t find Mrs. Krug, my only
recourse is to ask publicly. Are all book burners equal, but some less
equal than others?
 
Some people I spoke to for my article have charged that you are like one
of the Pro-Castro Marxists that sit on Council, and that if you don’t
have to you don’t want to post anything too negative about your hero,
Fidel. I can’t make that charge, as you’ve never explained your seeming
Pro-Cuba slant, or the un-selecting of news critical of Castro’s regime.
But I must say, something is very, very suspect when you and your
superiors, who are always lecturing people about how bad we have it here in
America
under the tyranny of the Patriot Act, etc. etc., cannot find
the time to make any comment about BOOK BURNING!!!!! Can you explain, so
that the charges vs. you, of ideological preference, can be dropped by
your critics?
 
I mean, if the common people of Cuba had access to the Internet (which
they don't), and they wrote a question like this to one of the
subservient officials of the Cuban Library Association, they would
possibly have the police pay them a visit, upon which all their books
would be stolen from them, and later burned. But we aren't in Cuba here,
Mr. Wood. We have a free press (although some of your colleagues think
that is a myth, like Chompsky says), and I am celebrating my 4th of July
and my enjoyment of free speech and press by writing this open letter to
you.
 
July 11, 2005
 
After not hearing anything yet from the officials at the OIF, Walter Skold starts a Book Burning Watch.
http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFFORUM/log0507/msg00113.html

Just how long is it going to take Don Wood or Mrs. Krug to respond to
the questions posted a week ago on this site? Even though the officials
on the International Relations Committee have known about the Cuban book
burning for over 1.5 years, the recent statements by Ray Bradbury have
put the issue on the "burner" again.
 
I'm starting the weekly ALA book-burning in Cuba censorship watch with
this post. One can only assume, that if Mr. Wood and others do not put
the information on their book burning website, nor answer public
questions posted on this forum, that they wish to censor this information.
 
See public query of one week ago:
http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFFORUM/log0507/msg00041.html
http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFFORUM/log0507/msg00050.html
 
"All book burners are equal, but some are more equal than others."
The new slogan for the ALA book-burning site? Hello Don....anybody out there?
 
July 11, 2005
 
Later that day Don Wood finally writes a reply to Walter Skold.
 
July 11, 2005
 
Dear Walter Skold,
 
I have attempted to verify the instances of book burnings in Cuba that you
cite, but am unable to find any references to them in legitimate news sources
(e.g., New York Times, Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle).  Please
send me such sources for your information.
 
Thank you.
Sincerely,  Don Wood
 
August 10, 2005
 
Steve Marquardt sends an e-mail to Don Wood containing book burning quotations and citations from the sentencing documents available at the Florida State University “Rule of Law and Cuba” web site, urging that this news be included on the “Book Burning in the 21t Century” web site of the ALA Office of Intellectual Freedom.

From: MARQUARDT, STEVE
Sent:
Wednesday, August 10, 2005 3:38 PM
To: Don Wood (dwood@ala.org)
Subject: Book Burning web page - new entry suggested

Don, I was interested to see Cuba included on the “Book Burning in the 21st Century” web page of ALA, at http://www.ala.org/ala/oif/bannedbooksweek/bookburning/21stcentury/21stcentury.htm, specifically this entry:
 
Pentagon: Koran was 'mishandled' at Guantanamo (April 6, 2005)
“The US military has detailed for the first time how soldiers at Guantanamo Bay mishandled the Koran, including a case in which a guard's urine splashed onto the Islamic holy book.”  See also Tortured Logic (June 7, 2005).
 
ALA should also include a reference to the incinerations and destruction of books documented at the Florida State University web site http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu/ where you can find the documentation that I have summarized below and in the attachment.
 
I would be interested in your response regarding how soon this information might be posted on ALA’s page.  Or please let me know if this suggestion needs to go to someone else.
 
August 11, 2005
 
Following inquiries by Walter Skold and the e-mail of yesterday, Don Wood replied:
 
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 9:20 AM
> To: Marquardt, Steve
> Cc: Beverley Becker; Deborah Caldwell-Stone; Jen Hammond; Judith Krug;
> Jonathan Kelley; Nanette Perez
> Subject: Re: Book Burning web page - new entry suggested
>
>
August 11, 2005
>
> Dear Steve Marquardt,
>
> Walter Skold has corresponded with the Office for Intellectual Freedom about this matter.  I believe he copied you and Steve Denney with our response via his reply ("Cuban Book Burning Sources," July 11, 2005).
>
> Once again, I and others have attempted to verify the instances of book burnings in
Cuba that you cite, but we are unable to find any references to them in legitimate news sources (e.g., New York Times, Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle).  Please send me such sources for your information.
>
> Thank you.

 
August 22, 2005
 
Nat Hentoff publishes the nationally-syndicated article, “Fidel’s Victims and enablers” in the Washington Times, citing just one of the bookburning edicts of the Cuban courts, and also publishing Ray Bradbury’s statement on the subject.
Available at http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20050821-103902-4719r.htm
<>
For years, Ray Bradbury's novel, "Fahrenheit 451... the temperature at which books burn," has been an inspiration to me and other millions around the world who believe in the freedom to read -- very particularly in those countries whose dictators forbid dissenting books.

We were talking about Fidel Mr. Castro's recurring crackdowns on those remarkably courageous Cubans who keep working to bring democracy to that grim island where dissenters, including independent librarians, are locked in cages, often for 20 or more years. Mr. Bradbury knew about the crackdowns, but until I told him, was not aware of Mr. Castro's kangaroo courts (while sentencing the "subversives") often ordering the burning of the independent libraries they raid, just like in "451." For example, on April 5, 2003, after Julio Valdes Guevara was sent away, the judge ruled: "As to the disposition of the photographic negatives, the audio cassette, medicines, books, magazines, pamphlets and the rest of the documents, they are to be destroyed by means of incineration because they lack usefulness." Hearing about this, Mr. Bradbury authorized me to convey this message from him to Fidel Castro: "I stand against any library or any librarian anywhere in the world being imprisoned or punished in any way for the books they circulate. I plead with Castro and his government to immediately take their hands off the independent librarians and release all those librarians in prison, and to send them back into Cuban culture to inform the people." Among the books destroyed through the years by Fidel's arsonists have been volumes on Martin Luther King Jr., the U.S. Constitution, and even a book by the late Jose Marti, who organized, and was killed in, the Cuban people's struggle for independence. . . .

September 15, 2005
 
FREADOM issues a press release: “Read a Burned Book, Librarians Urge,”
(Original copy at: http://webpages.charter.net/tomeboy/cubanbook.html)
 
For Immediate Release September 15, 2005

READ A BURNED BOOK LIBRARIANS URGE Re: Banned Books Week (September 25 - October 2, 2004)
To mark this year’s celebration of Banned Books Week (BBW), a nationwide group of librarians is encouraging readers to protest cases of censorship and human rights abuses by reading literature that has literally been burned.

But first a quiz.

“What do The Biography of Martin Luther King, Jr., the US Constitution, certain works by José Martí, The Power of the Powerless, by Vaclav Havel, and Your Body is Yours, have in common?”, asks Steve Marquardt, the co-founder of FREADOM, and Dean of Libraries at South Dakota State University.

“They are among the hundreds of books, pamphlets, and personal papers that have been judged ‘subversive’ and ordered burned by Cuban authorities in recent years in their crackdown against independent libraries and independent thought,” says Marquardt, a long-time human rights activist.

FREADOM, a 2-year old group of librarians, writers, and human rights activists, is calling on libraries to display these and other burned books during BBW, and is asking patrons to read such literature to celebrate American liberties.

“In America, local librarians are often on the front lines of defense for upholding the principles of intellectual freedom and the freedom to read,” said Marquardt, “But in Cuba, book burning is documented as a state-sanctioned answer to independent reading.”

By challenging library patrons to read books that were ordered burned, the FREADOM group is hoping to raise awareness of the persecuted Independent Library movement in Cuba that began in 1998, but in recent years has seen several of its directors jailed and library collections incinerated.

“We librarians have the freedom to oppose our President, circulate books which argue that he is a criminal, help change our laws, or find any book on any topic that a patron wants,” said Marquardt, “But in Cuba you can go to jail for lending the wrong book to your neighbor.”

Earlier this June, Ray Bradbury author, of the famed “Fahrenheit 451,” said “I stand against any library or any librarian anywhere in the world being imprisoned or punished in any way for the books they circulate,” and he called on Castro to unconditionally release all jailed librarians

Cuban government and library officials deny that there is censorship in Cuba and say that any dissident librarians jailed by the Castro regime have been tried as “agents” of the United States, which, along with other governments, has openly supported the growth of the Independent Library movement in Cuba.
 

“It would be particularly useful for American to realize again just how subversive the US Constitution is of tyrannical powers like those which Fidel Castro wields,” said Walter Skold, a librarian and writer from Maine.

“In schools around the country last week we’ve just celebrated the Constitution, which forbids any government authority from burning books or closing independent publications,” said Skold, “And Banned Books Week gives us the opportunity to not only celebrate our press freedoms, but also to remember those writers and librarians worldwide who can be jailed for “incorrect” thoughts.”

A partial list of the many books burned in Cuba, as well as information about writing letters to support the Independent Libraries in Cuba can be found at the groups blog site: www.4freadom.org/blog

As part of its efforts, FREADOM is publicizing the Center for the Advancement of Human Rights (http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu/index.cfm), which has online the official sentencing documents smuggled from Cuba that detail which books and materials were ordered burned by Cuban courts.

“FREADOM is happy to join with the American Library Association, the American Booksellers Association, and the American Society of Journalists and Authors in calling on Americans to read books that have been burned or banned as a way of exercising the freedoms we have,” said Marquardt.

Partial List of Burned Books
  Universal Declaration of Human Rights
  The Biography of Martin Luther King, Jr.
  Cuba's Repressive Machinery: by Human Rights Watch
  The Black Book of Communism
  US Constitution
  The Power of the Powerless by Vaclav Havel
  Diary of the Cuban Revolution by Carlos Franqui
  Como Llego La Noche by Huber Matos
 
September 16, 2005
 
The September 2, 2005, Associated Press article by John Pain – “Cuban documents show dissidents received no justice” – is sent to Don Wood by Walter Skold.

From: WSkold
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 5:29 PM
Subject: AP Article on Sentencing Documents 2003

Here is a copy of the AP article from Sept 2, when FSU apparently had their press conference. I could not find in Lexis any other papers that ran articles, but Mr. Schlakman told me that other papers in Florida had articles. He said on Tuesday he would check his press files/kit from 2003.

I would go ahead and email this to Don Wood, those of you who have contacted him. My guess is that he will still refuse to accept it because the AP did not actually do an investigation to see if the documents were authentic (double standard) and because the US Interests Section is mentioned as helping them to obtain them. That is as well a concern for me, that I will ask Mr. Schlakman about.

September 2, 2003, Tuesday, BC cycle

SECTION: State and Regional
LENGTH: 596 words
HEADLINE: Officials: Cuban documents show dissidents received no justice
BYLINE: By JOHN PAIN, Associated Press Writer
DATELINE: MIAMI

The sentencing documents of the 75 Cuban dissidents convicted in the Castro government's crackdown on opposition earlier this year show the lack of basic freedoms, human rights and impartial justice on the communist island, supporters of a university project said Tuesday.

The documents were obtained by
Florida State University, which launched a Web site Tuesday containing the hundreds of pages of court records.

The university's Center for the Advancement of Human Rights worked with the U.S. Interests Section in
Havana to get the documents but the center funded the Web site independently, university officials said.

"As a Cuban-American whose family escaped a totalitarian regime ... I know the price a society pays when it lacks freedom to speak, freedom to worship and freedom to dissent," Florida Supreme Court Justice Raoul Cantero said before a news conference at the university in Tallahassee.

The 75 defendants, including independent journalists, were sentenced in April for receiving money from the
U.S. government and working with Washington to undermine the regime of Cuban President Fidel Castro. They received anywhere from six to 28 years in prison. None of the trials lasted more than a day.

"People are really getting arrested simply for disagreeing with their government," Cantero said at the news conference.

The goal of the Web site is to draw attention to the "very, very severe and we think draconian human rights abuses," according to Terry Coonan, the center's executive director. The site is also intended to invite people to advocacy, he said.

Carlos Rey, a law student from
Miami, was one of the students who worked on developing the Web site this summer.

"This is not simply a Cuban issue," Rey said. "It's not simply a Cuban-American issue. It's a human issue."

Katia Tchourioukanova, who came to the
United States from Russia six years ago, is studying education at Florida State. She also worked on the Web site.

"You don't have to be a political science major or a lawyer or a diplomat to become involved in the field of human rights and to try to make some difference," she said.

Lazaro Herrera, a spokesman with the Cuban Government Interests Section in
Washington, declined comment Tuesday. Cuba's government has said the trials were necessary to protect itself from U.S.-funded attacks.

The sentencing documents detail how the defendants received money, computers, recording equipment and other help in
Havana from the U.S. Interests Section, Washington's diplomatic outpost. The dissidents set up Web sites, talked on U.S.-funded radio stations and published articles to criticize the Cuban government, the documents said.

One journalist, Julio Cesar Galvez Rodriguez, was convicted of "trying to plant the seeds of uncertainty and distrust in the population about the revolutionary functioning of our social system." He was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

Joe Garcia, executive director of the Cuban American National Foundation, said the documents give a clear picture of the faults of the Cuban justice system.

"There is no actual process of reaching evidence and establishing fact," he said. "These are accusatory documents that are often ratified by the prosecution and defense attorneys."

"At the expense of the 75 political prisoners, the Castro regime has provided the world with an unfortunately tragic view of the state of affairs in
Cuba today," said Mark Schlakman, program director of the university's center.

On the Net: Rule of Law and
Cuba: www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu

September 28-30, 2005
 
Cuba’s banned and burned books is the subject of a exhibit booth display at the Nebraska Library Association conference in Lincoln, assembled by Robert Boyce of the Lincoln City Libraries.
 
September 29, 2006
 
Steve Marquardt of South Dakota State University and Mark Wetmore of the Vermillion Public Library Board make a presentation about Cuba’s imprisoned library workers, a sister library relationship with the Dulce María Loynaz Library of Havana. The presentation includes a display of several of the books the incineration of which is known to have been ordered by the Cuban courts.
 
October 7, 2006
 
Steve and Mark repeat their presentation and display at the South Dakota Library Association conference in Pierre.
 
Thursday October 13, 2005
 
Three requested newspaper articles about Cuba’s court-ordered book burning were sent to Don Wood by Walter Skold. 
The newspapers that published these reports were the Miami Herald, the Orlando Sun-Sentinel, and the Tallahassee Democrat. Notice of this was posted publicly on the alaoif list, see below:
 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alaoif--ala1.ala.org/message/35720?viscount=100&l=1
 
[IFFORUM:4327] Don Wood & Cuban Book Burning- Part 2
Thursday October 13, 2005
 
Re: Public challenge to Mr. Wood and Associates (See today's story at:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19814 )

On Monday, July 11, I started a Cuba Book Burning watch,
http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFFORUM/log0507/msg00113.html
and later that day Mr. Wood wrote me the following (referenced in an August e-mail):

"I and others have attempted to verify the instances of book burnings in Cuba that you cite, but we are unable to find any references to them in legitimate news sources (e.g., New York Times, Washington Post, San Francisco Chronicle).  Please send me such sources for your information.    Thank you."

I have answered Mr. Wood's request by sending him the documentation he requested this morning. Here is the e-mail I sent him and the others at the OIF office. When they have found the time to review the evidence a public response would be welcome.

To: dwood@...
Subject: News Articles You requested on Cuban book burning
Cc: jkrug@...,dstone@...,bbecker@...,nperez@...
X-Attachments: C:\Documents and Settings\Walter\My Documents\MLS\FREADOM\Press\Book Burning 05\FSU Docs\TallDemocratPressConference.pdf; C:\Documents and Settings\Walter\My Documents\MLS\FREADOM\Press\Book Burning 05\FSU Docs\SunSentinelPressConference.doc; C:\Documents and Settings\Walter\My Documents\MLS\FREADOM\Press\Book Burning 05\FSU Docs\HeraldPressConference.pdf;

Dear Mr. Wood,

On July 11th you asked me, and later my friends at FREADOM, for newspaper accounts of the Cuban book burning before you would be able to put that information on the 21st Century book-burning page of OIF. After some research I am responding to that request (and cc'ing the folks you included in your cc to Steve Marquardt on August 11th)

I am enclosing three articles from the Florida press in September of 2003, all of which come from reputable newspapers there, whose editors must have felt the veracity of the documents was established. As you know, and are right to be on guard for, they have to be careful of false information from all sides with regards to
Cuba.

Besides these articles, I am including the link to a story of mine which appeared today:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19814

Besides the articles, I have done my own investigative research, by speaking with the Cuba expert at Amnesty International, USA, and it seems that a very strong case can be made for the veracity of the book-burning cases documented in the court papers from Cuab. The article I wrote makes a public challenge to you and your office, Mr. Wood, which includes these two paragraphs:


”But getting back to the issue of burned books in Cuba, now that a fellow librarian has provided him with several reliable sources, as well as information from the head researcher for Amnesty International, whose phone number I’ll gladly give him, I wonder if he will now add the incidents of fanatical communist book burning in Cuba to the OIF public-service website? In the first part of this series I said that
ALA officials seemingly have no problem censoring such information. If nothing is added to the website, and no credible reason is given as to why the sources I cite are themselves wrong, then the public would sadly have to conclude that the ALA wants to censor this information.”

Also, "Since the editors of FRONTPAGE believe in academic freedom, I’m sure they would be happy to give Mr. Wood an opportunity to explain why book burning and library destruction in
Cuba is not a human rights or censorship issue."

Now that I have sent you the information that you requested, my colleagues and I at FREADOM look forward to hearing what the opinion of your office is with regards to posting the Cuban citation to the 21st Century page.

Sincerely, Walter Skold

 
October 14, 2006
 
Steve Marquardt repeats the presentation and display at the joint conference of the Wyoming Library Association and the Mountain Plains Library Association, in Jackson.  He also presented at this joint conference an October 13 poster session on the theme of “Taking Banned Books Week International” by offering library users the opportunity to learn about and sign petitions for the release of imprisoned authors in foreign lands, including persons whose books had been seized and burned.
 
[October 18, 2006] Below is part of the message that the WLA President recently sent.  I would encourage all SDLA members to go to the web site and look at the presentations that were webcast.  This is the first time that MPLA has ever participated in such a venture.  There were some absolutely excellent speakers the quality of which I have not personally heard in a long time.  It is well worth your time to check it out – Joe
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``
Greetings!
 
I'd like to thank everyone from Wyoming who made the Joint WLA/MPLA Conference so wonderful.  For those of you who could not make it, or if you missed a program, remember that most of the conference was webcast.  The webcast website is http://www.tclib.org/mpla and the archive should be available today.  Also, many WLA and MPLA members blogged their experiences (thanks MPLA EC Committee!) and that website is at http://mplawla2005.blogspot.com
 
Erin Kinney
WLA President & Webmistress
WLA/MPLA Joint Conference Co-Chair
 
October 18, 2006
 
Receiving no answer from Don Wood to his quation on IFFORUM asking about posting the Cuban book burning on the ALA web page devoted to that subject, Walter Skold again sent an e-mail query to Mr. Wood.

From: owner-IFFORUM@ala.org [mailto:owner-IFFORUM@ala.org] On Behalf Of Walter Skold
Sent:
Tuesday, October 18, 2005 12:29 PM
To: Intellectual Freedom Forum
Subject: [IFFORUM:4374] Book Burning: 2 Weeks and Waiting Mr. Wood....

Dear Mr. Wood,

<>

A week ago now I wrote you a public question (see:

http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFFORUM/log0510/msg00064.html) in which I asked you when you are going to put the information about Cuban book burning on the page you edit. I also sent you the newspaper evidence that you had requested, from three reputable papers in Florida.

<>On the same day, a long article was published (see: (http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19814)* in which the evidence was laid out about Cuban book burning, including the testimony of the head researcher for Amnesty International. If you and the folks at the OIF wish to be considered censors of this news, so be it, but before I come to that conclusion I'll give you another week to respond, just in case you were on vacation last week. I also e-mailed the documents to every member of the OIF office.You have been presented with the evidence you requested sir, when will you post the link to you site or explain why the Amnesty researcher and Florida papers are lying or deceived?

<>

 Sincerely, Walter Skold

<>

(PS. I am sorry to say, but this issue will NOT go away. The credibility of your judgment is on the line, and you are a leading representative of our profession. To my knowledge you have never expressed admiration for Castro's regime - as have other Council members - so it is hard to figure out the continual silence of people who tell the rest of us about intellectual freedom....)

<>

* From http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=19814 is the following account of ALA investigation into the Cuban issue, including claims of book burning:

During the few months that committee looked into the situation in Cuba, the former president of the ALA and head of the task force, John W. Berry, claimed in an e-mail to the ALA Council that “The International Relations Office is currently investigating the group hosting these documents and is examining the veracity of the documents themselves.”

Here are the serious problems with this claim that ALA committee-members should be forced by Council members to explain:

1.) I called Mr. Mark Schlakman, who directs the FSU Center for Center for the Advancement of Human Rights. Not only did he provide me with three news articles from major Florida newspapers, the professional editors and journalist of which all apparently trusted validity of the Cuban court documents, but he also discussed the often-dangerous process by which these sorts of documents escape Cuba. Why couldn’t Mr. Wood find these press articles, and if he tried to verify the disputed documents, why didn’t he simply call FSU like I did?

2.) Mr. Berry said his task force was “investigating” the FSU center, but officials I spoke to there have no recollection of anyone from the ALA calling them to ask about the documents or how they judged them authentic. Mr. Berry, who did you ask about this group, Fidel Castro? How did you examine the veracity of these documents if you or a staffer never called the center that released them?

3.) Perhaps something of the zeal of this task force to get to the bottom of Cuban crimes is best revealed in this pathetic fact.  Mr. Berry claimed that his task force looked at reports written by Amnesty International (AI) and other human rights groups. That’s funny, I called one Holly Ackerman, the main Cuba researcher for Amnesty International in the US and herself an academic librarian, and she said no one from the ALA ever called her to ask about these documents. What is worse is this – Ms. Ackerman told me that she sent a personal letter to the committee and offered to help them with their investigation and to answer any questions they had. She told me that no one ever wrote her back. Essentially, the AI contact in the US was ignored by this dedicated task force! Even Ms. Ackerman was astounded, as she said that at least when groups or governments don’t want AI’s help they at least write back and say thank you for offering!  [Holly Ackerman told Steve Marquardt that ALA never contacted anyone at AIUSA or AI headquarters in London, in which event she, as the Cuba country specialist, would have been notified. – Steve Marquardt]

Now . . . there is the issue of the veracity of the book burning reports to return to.

First, Mr. Wood, Mrs. Ackerman spent 30 minutes explaining the detailed, careful and sometimes dangerous process by which the International Secretariat of AI goes about verifying documents like those smuggled from Cuba. She said the organization would never have concluded that these 75 people were prisoners of conscience if they did not have full confidence that the documents were authentic copies. She explained that because of intelligence officers infiltrating groups like the independent libraries, there is much danger, as well as disinformation, when it comes to information coming from Cuba. Also, the sources which AI have actually risk their freedom by helping to smuggle such documents out . . .

Secondly, you demanded from my colleagues and me at FREADOM articles from “legitimate” papers and now I have at least three of them. One of them is an editorial about the documents from the September 6, 2003 issue of the Sun-Sentinel, which include this:

“The charges, not the dissidents’ actions, are what is criminal. No human being, in any country on this planet, should be jailed for one second, let alone decades, for voicing an opinion.”

It seems pretty clear that Mr. Wood trusts the editorial judgments of this paper because jut two weeks ago he alerted his IFACTION readers about the story from the Sun-Sentinel (http://lp-web.ala.org:8000/guest/archives/IFACTION/log0509/msg00141.html) in which a local library director caved into pressure by a Cuban-American Democrat official to change the date of a showing of the movie “Motorcycle Diaries” which glorifies the mass murderer, Che.

October 19, 2006
 
Walter Skold posts a brief account of his having sent e-mails of October 13 to Don Wood and Judith Krug, with no response being returned,
 
October 21, 2006
 
Walter Skold sent a certified letter to Don Wood to confirm his receipt of documentation of the book burning in Cuba.
 
October 26, 2006
 
Steve Marquardt repeats the banned and burned books presentation and display at the annual conference of the Wisconsin Library Association, in La Crosse.
 
November 17, 2006
 
The receipt card from the certified letter is received by Walter Skold, who telephones Don Wood and is told by the latter that “the office is still discussing it.”  Walter Skold’s notes of this conversation follow:

Hi Mr Wood, this is Walter Skold, how are you?

Silence...fine.

Say, since I sent you the articles you asked for recently I was wondering when you might be considering if you will put the news on the book burning website?

(deadly pause...Don coming up with excuse...[in a tert tone]: "The office is still discussing it."

[I was momentarily stunned, not being prepared for a stonewall] O, well, aren't you in charge of the website, can't you make a change on your own?

[defensively] "I am not the director of the office!" We will need to wait until Mrs. Krug comes back, "she is still recuperating from surgery."

I then changed the topic and asked what he thought about having citations at the burning site about incidents which did NOT have to do with actual burning, and why these incidents were not on banning web pages. I remarked that I'm sure he'd agree with me that charges of book burning are serious...

He said he did "not see the big difference between banning and burning" and compared it to being killed by a gun or a knife, and then said "I think you have an axe to grind and that is why you are intentionally making something of it" when there really isn't an issue.

I said yes I do have bias on this issue, but the reason it is important is because I too am a professional librarian, and charges of book burning are too serious to make non-chalantly.

"This is our website, we don't tell you what to put on your website."

"Yes, but your site says it is a public service and it solicits feedback. In fact, you often post things to IFACTION that concerned members of the Intellectual Freedom Network send you."

[getting pissed] "You don't know what we don't publish that people send us"

"True, But I do know what you have not posted that I sent you."

(Sensing the conversation reaching a nadir, and not having the presence of mind to ask him "Have you called Holly Ackerman yet," I began to end the call...

He said "alright" when I asked him to let me know when they have made a decision, but he didn't give any timeline as to when Krug would be back to the office....

Why the hell does it take a collective decision, when Don post whatever he hell he wants to any day of the week and Krug does not vet his posts???? Why is a meeting necessary about
Cuba? And why no meetings necessary when it comes to alleged urination on a Koran when it is the US Army who are the ones charges (and also why no mention in the citation that the military investigation cleared everyone of the charge of intentionally pissing on a Koran, and, if memory serves, relieved soldiers of duty who had thrown the Koran on the floor or something like that. In any case, there was NO burning at all.

November 30, 2006
 
Rosa Baez, of the Bibioteca Nacional José Martí and its online publications La Polilla and Librinsula, posts a message to IFFORUM stating that the “extensive list of leaflets (or marked counter revolutionary character,” seized from the library of Julio Antonio Valdes Guevara “are not even useful for a reading eager and knowledgeable public of   excellent readings) [sic] an honest judge has decreed the insineration [sic] for mistake of ‘thirty two leaflets on the letter of human rights”, it is an open to criticism mistake, but not a ‘crime of lesa humanity’”.
 
December 31, 2005

Note Posted on previous edition of FREADOM blog: (Available at Wayback Machine or in our Archives)
 
"Let's see, how many months has it been since Mr. Wood at the OIF office
of ALA has been presented with the EVIDENCE for book burning in Cuba,
and yet there is nothing about it on the book burning web site. Back on
November 17 his explanation was that Mrs. Krug was sick, and that the
office was "still discussing" the issue anyway.
 
Don, what is taking so long to make a decision, and why is there any
need to "decide" something which the facts you requested are so clear? Could
it be ideology? We hope not, but what alternative is there for folks to
think when you ignore the Cuban actions, and continue to promote "book
burning" stories in the US which have no book burning at all?
We at FREADOM will be asking you again in the New Year Don. Since other
news stories on the web indicate that Mrs. Krug has attented meetings in
December, it would seem she is physically able to continue the serious
office meeting you claim is taking place to decide this issue.
Happy New Year!
 
February 28, 2006
 
Library Association of Latvia adopts a “Resolution on Imprisoned Cuban Librarians for IFLA 2006” containing a reference to books “ordered to be seized or burned by the Cuban courts (http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu)” and resolving that IFLA should protest “the seizure and burning of their library collections . . .”
 
March 9, 2006
 
The Lithuanian Librarians Association “Draft Resolution on Imprisoned Cuban Librarians for IFLA 2006 Conference Agenda” containing a reference to books “ordered to be seized or burned by the Cuban courts (http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu)” and resolving that IFLA should protest “the seizure and burning of their library collections . . .”
 
http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/council2006.htm
LATVIJAS BIBLIOTEKĀRU BIEDRĪBA
LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OF LATVIA
K.Barona iela 14                                                                       Tālr.: (371) 7365251 Rīga, LV-1423        Fakss: (371) 7280851
Tērbatas iela 75                                                                         Tālr.: 7312791; 7312776 Rīga, LV-1001 Tālr./ fakss: (371) 7312793 Latvija                                                                E-pasts: lbb@lnb.lv
IFLA Secretariat:

RESOLUTION ON IMPRISONED CUBAN LIBRARIANS FOR IFLA 2006

Whereas IFLA's commitment to defend freedom of access to information is based on Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees everyone the right to "seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"; and

Whereas the IFLA resolution on human rights and librarians, adopted in Munich, Germany, 1983, states: "In the name of human rights, librarians must, as a profession, express their solidarity with those of their colleagues who are persecuted for their opinions, wherever they may be" (http://www.ifla.org/faife/policy/munich.htm); and

Whereas IFLA/FAIFE’s Mission and Actions statement declares:
“IFLA/FAIFE responds to violations of freedom of access to information and freedom of expression affecting libraries and librarianship. IFLA and IFLA/FAIFE supports and cooperates with relevant international bodies, organisations or campaigns such as UNESCO, International PEN, Article XIX, Index on Censorship, IFEX and Amnesty International” (http://www.ifla.org/faife/faife/presen.htm); and

Whereas in 2003 the Cuban government intensified a campaign of repression directed against Cuban citizens who have opened a network of uncensored libraries designed to challenge government control of information, resulting in one-day trials which sentenced a number of the librarians to prison sentences of 20 years or more; and

Whereas Cuban court documents, removed from the island and published on the Internet, prove that the independent librarians were arrested for the alleged crime of opening libraries, and that thousands of books in their collections, including copies of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, books by George Orwell and other classic works of freedom, were labeled "subversive" and ordered to be seized or burned by the Cuban courts (http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu); and

Whereas the independent librarians imprisoned in Cuba have been named as prisoners of conscience by Amnesty International which, along with other human rights organizations such as International PEN, Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders, is demanding the immediate and unconditional release of the librarians on the grounds that they have been convicted for exercising their right to freedom of expression; and

Whereas computers being shipped to Cuba by organizations in the United States were recently confiscated by U.S. border agents; therefore Be it Resolved that
IFLA protests the ongoing persecution of independent librarians in Cuba and the seizure and burning of their library collections, and we join Amnesty International and other human rights organizations in calling for the immediate release of the independent librarians in Cuba who are imprisoned for exercising their rights to intellectual freedom; and

that IFLA expresses solidarity with all those in Cuba, in both the official and unofficial library world, who struggle against difficult economic and political obstacles in order to meet the information needs of the Cuban people; and

that IFLA condemns the 2005 seizure by United States border agents of computer equipment being shipped to Cuba, which is a violation of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
 
Adopted at the 11th Conference of the Library Association of Latvia (LAL),
Riga, 28 February 2006
 
Anna Mauliņa  LAL President  
(The original document with signature sent to IFLA HQ by mail.)
 
LIETUVOS BIBLIOTEKININKŲ DRAUGIJA LITHUANIAN LIBRARIANS’ ASSOCIATION
Kodas 9191897             Šv.Ignoto g. 6-108         Tel./faks: 8~389 61606
                                    LT-2600 Vilnius            El.p.: lbd@uvb.lt
Dear IFLA Headquarters,

Lithuanian Librarians‘ Association would like to propose
DRAFT OF A RESOLUTION ON CUBA FOR THE IFLA 2006 CONFERENCE AGENDA

Whereas IFLA's commitment to defend freedom of access to information is based on Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees everyone the right to "seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers;" and

Whereas the IFLA resolution on human rights and librarians, adopted in Munich, Germany, 1983, states:
"In the name of human rights, librarians must, as a profession, express their solidarity with those of their colleagues who are persecuted for their opinions, wherever they may be" (http://www.ifla.org/faife/policy/munich.htm); and

Whereas IFLA/FAIFE’s Mission and Actions statement declares:
“IFLA/FAIFE responds to violations of freedom of access to information and freedom of expression affecting libraries and librarianship.... IFLA and IFLA/FAIFE supports and co-operates with relevant international bodies, organisations or campaigns such as UNESCO, International PEN, Article XIX, Index on Censorship, IFEX and Amnesty International” (http://www.ifla.org/faife/faife/presen.htm); and

Whereas in 2003 the Cuban government intensified a campaign of repression directed against Cuban citizens who have opened a network of uncensored libraries designed to challenge government control of information, resulting in one-day trials which sentenced a number of the librarians to prison sentences of 20 years or more; and

Whereas Cuban court documents, removed from the island and published on the Internet, prove that the independent librarians were arrested for the alleged crime of opening libraries, and that thousands of books in their collections, including copies of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, books by George Orwell and other classic works of freedom, were labeled "subversive" and ordered to be seized or burned by the Cuban courts (http://www.ruleoflawandcuba.fsu.edu); and

Whereas the independent librarians imprisoned in Cuba have been named as prisoners of conscience by Amnesty International which, along with other human rights organizations such as International PEN, Human Rights Watch and Reporters Without Borders, is demanding the immediate and unconditional release of the librarians on the grounds that they have been convicted for exercising their right to freedom of expression; and

Whereas computers being shipped to Cuba by organizations in the United States were recently confiscated by U.S. border agents; therefore

Be it Resolved that
IFLA protests the ongoing persecution of independent librarians in Cuba and the seizure and burning of their library collections, and we join Amnesty International and other human rights organizations in calling for the immediate release of the independent librarians in Cuba who are imprisoned for exercising their rights to intellectual freedom; and

that IFLA expresses solidarity with all those in Cuba, in both the official and unofficial library world, who struggle against difficult economic and political obstacles in order to meet the information needs of the Cuban people; and

that IFLA condemns the 2005 seizure by United States border agents of computer equipment being shipped to Cuba, which is a violation of Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Signed by:
Vida Garunkštytė President Lithuanian Librarians Association
 
Emilija Banionytė Vice-President Lithuanian Librarians Association
 
March 9, 2006 Vilnius, Lithuania
(The original document with signatures sent to IFLA HQ by mail.)
 
March 13, 2006
<>Ten (10) of 19 ALA Council candidates responding to an informal e-mail poll expressed opposition to the book burning in Cuba and support for listing this Cuban violation of reading material on the ALA book burning web site.  For details, see the “Freadom” blog site at http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=22980467 and
http://www.blogger.com/posts.g?blogID=22980467.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Trial of